Call: 1-877-697-2926

WOW! Down 4500 Broadband Subs, Liberty's GCI Down 900

WideOpenWest, known as WOW!, reported a net loss of 4,500 broadband subscribers in the first quarter of 2024. This comes after a steeper loss of 6,900 customers in Q4 2023, bringing the six-month total to 11,400. As of March 31, 2024, WOW! maintained 495,900 broadband subscribers across its footprint, a noticeable drop from the 507,300 reported in September 2023.

This ongoing dip signals two key issues: competitive disruption in key markets like Michigan and Alabama, and a stagnation in gigabit-tier adoption. While WOW! has invested in greenfield expansion—adding 20,400 new homes passed in Q1—the gains have yet to neutralize customer churn in legacy markets, where fiber competitors have stepped up their pace.

Liberty’s GCI Drops 900 Subscribers in Alaska

GCI, a wholly-owned subsidiary of Liberty Broadband and the largest telecom operator in Alaska, reported a loss of 900 cable modem subscribers in Q1 2024. Compared to the previous quarter’s drop of 600, the rate of attrition appears to be accelerating slightly. This quarter’s decline brought GCI’s residential cable modem base down to roughly 122,800, continuing a slow, steady attrition pattern visible since early 2022.

Despite the losses, GCI retains a dominant position in the Alaskan broadband landscape. The company covers over 85% of urban households across Anchorage, Fairbanks, and Juneau, with limited competition beyond smaller wireless ISPs and the Alaska Communications fiber footprint. Still, as fiber deployment from smaller players reaches semi-urban clusters, GCI's reliance on hybrid coax-fiber infrastructure reveals cracks in retention strategy.

Comparative Slippage: Year-over-Year Metrics

Impact on Liberty Broadband’s Financials

Liberty Broadband, which holds GCI under its Liberty Ventures Group, reported revenue from GCI of $245 million in Q1 2024—a 1% decline from the same quarter last year. The broadband subscriber dip plays a role, but so does flat ARPU (Average Revenue Per User), which remained at $57.30 despite increased bandwidth utilization.

In investor disclosures, Liberty did not signal aggressive restructuring or new capital allocation for GCI's broadband segment. This suggests a measured approach focused on stabilizing its existing base, rather than accelerating market conquest.

Market Share and Regional Pressure

WOW!'s position has become increasingly regional. The company exited several territories over the past three years to refocus on markets in the Midwest and Southeast. Yet with fiber overbuild accelerating in Michigan, and new entrants in Georgia, WOW!’s market share has eroded—dropping by roughly 1.1 percentage points in its core metro markets since Q1 2023, according to Leichtman Research Group analysis.

GCI’s dominance in Alaska cushions its losses, but the erosion, while seemingly marginal, now marks its eighth consecutive quarter of declining broadband subs. Competitors like MTA and Alaska Communications have launched new fiber corridors in Anchorage and Eagle River, which have already started pulling down GCI’s penetration rates in selected census blocks.

Geographic Footprint: Contrasting Reach

Geography shapes growth potential. WOW!’s challenge comes from urban fiber expansion in competitive states. GCI’s constraint comes from the logistical cost of scaling in sparsely populated regions where satellite and fixed wireless are claiming unserved zones.

Visualizing the Decline

Subscriber attrition follows a clear trend. Examine the graph below to see quarterly broadband subscriber changes for both providers from Q1 2022 through Q1 2024:

A regional coverage map reveals further dynamics. WOW!'s contracted footprint contrasts with GCI’s expansive—though increasingly vulnerable—territory in Alaska. Different geographies, distinct problems, but parallel subscriber pressure.

Market Tensions Across Local and National Lines: Interpreting Broadband Trends

Contrasting National Growth with Localized Declines

Nationally, broadband subscriptions continue to climb. Between Q1 2023 and Q1 2024, providers in the U.S. added over 3.5 million new broadband customers, according to Leichtman Research Group. This growth centers primarily around fiber and fixed wireless options, which made up around 96% of all net additions during that period.

Yet despite this expansion, specific regional providers like WOW! and GCI are losing subscribers. WOW! dropped 4,500 broadband subscriptions, and Liberty’s GCI lost nearly 900. These declines contrast sharply with gains at national players such as T-Mobile, which added approximately 405,000 fixed wireless broadband customers in Q1 2024 alone.

The Crucial Role of Regional ISPs

Regional Internet Service Providers remain fixtures in rural and geographically complex markets. In states like Alaska, Montana, and parts of the Mountain West, national providers often fail to expand due to high infrastructure costs and lower population densities. Providers like GCI have historically filled that service gap.

When these providers lose customers, the consequences ripple well beyond business metrics. Community anchor institutions like schools, small clinics, and remote workforces in underserved counties often have no viable alternative. Subscriber churn in these markets can limit broadband access altogether, rather than redirect it to competitors.

Fiber Expansion and the Rise of Wireless Disruptors

Consumer demand is shifting. Nationwide, more users prioritize symmetrical upload/download speeds, streaming stability, and low latency. This trend has pushed fiber-optic broadband to the forefront. As of early 2024, AT&T reported over 8.6 million fiber subscribers—more than double its 2020 count.

Wireless disruptors are also intensifying competition. T-Mobile and Verizon’s fixed wireless access (FWA) services are carving into traditional cable’s market share. The combination of minimal installation requirements, bundled savings with mobile plans, and rapid deployment timelines makes FWA appealing in metro outskirts and rural fringe zones.

Consider this: between Q1 2022 and Q1 2024, cable broadband collectively lost over 1 million subscribers. During the same period, FWA providers added more than 5 million. Regional ISPs that haven't pivoted to fiber, or can't compete on pricing and flexibility, see these losses reflected directly in their subscriber tallies.

These intersecting shifts point to a broadband market evolving at two distinct speeds—one driven by urban investment and technology upgrades, and the other challenged by geography, cost, and regulatory inertia.

Idaho, Utah, and Wyoming: The Broadband Battle Against Geography

Local Broadband Access Challenges

Across Idaho, Utah, and Wyoming, broadband availability varies not only by city but by canyon, valley, and ridge. In sparsely populated rural counties—such as Sublette County in western Wyoming or Bear Lake County in southeastern Idaho—reliable internet service still lags behind urban standards. According to the FCC’s 2023 Broadband Progress Report, over 18% of rural areas in these three states lack access to speeds of 25 Mbps download and 3 Mbps upload, the federal threshold for broadband qualification. Compare that to 1.5% in urban zones nationwide.

Limited options mean customers tend to rely on a few dominant providers or settle for satellite. When those networks underperform or overcharge, churn spikes, and subscriber losses like WOW!'s 4,500 drop or GCI’s 900 departure become more understandable.

Presence of WOW! and Liberty Broadband in the Mountain West

In Utah and Idaho, WOW! owns only isolated infrastructure, operating mostly in secondary markets or via legacy systems acquired from past acquisitions. Its emphasis has primarily been on cable TV and bundled service models, which compete poorly as fixed wireless and fiber initiatives enter the scene.

Liberty Broadband’s GCI, though based in Alaska, extends into northern Idaho and western Wyoming via state-funded connectivity programs. GCI’s rural reach is more targeted, but slow rollout outside of Alaska has limited its impact. In regional markets, such reach still places it among a small list of ISPs willing to tackle ambitious—and expensive—rural infrastructure challenges.

Infrastructure and Topographical Constraints

Building reliable broadband across the Mountain West’s rugged terrain comes with costs few providers are eager to shoulder. Fiber deployment in areas like Utah’s Uintah Basin or Idaho’s Sawtooth Valley requires trenching through rocky soil, scaling elevation changes, and navigating federal land regulations. A single mile of rural fiber can cost upwards of $27,000, based on estimates from the Benton Institute for Broadband & Society.

Microwave towers offer one solution, but signal obstruction from mountains or forest canopy often necessitates multiple relay sites. These infrastructure hurdles slow expansion and lead many national ISPs to deprioritize the region. Smaller regional providers—including Silver Star Communications in Wyoming and Utah’s UTOPIA Fiber—have filled some gaps, but scaling has proven difficult without municipal backing or federal broadband subsidies.

Navigating the broadband puzzle in the Mountain West demands more than technical innovation—it requires policy coordination, local investment, and deliberate planning across elevation maps rather than ZIP codes. When subscribers leave providers like WOW! and GCI, the data tells part of the story; the terrain fills in the rest.

Churn Factor: Why Customers Are Leaving

Poor Service Experiences Drive Disengagement

Technical reliability and responsive customer support continue to shape consumer decisions. When broadband connections drop during peak hours or tech support fails to resolve issues quickly, subscribers reevaluate their options. According to the American Customer Satisfaction Index (ACSI) 2023 Telecommunications Study, broadband providers scored an average of 68 out of 100 in customer satisfaction—one of the lowest rankings in the survey. This sentiment correlates closely with increasing churn.

Service recovery time and first-contact resolution rates often determine whether a consumer stays or switches. For instance, in areas where dropouts persist or wait times exceed 30 minutes, providers face a higher risk of attrition. Customers compare these lapses to experiences offered by fiber-exclusive providers boasting 24/7 support and sub-10-minute average response times.

Price Sensitivity and Promotional Lures

Competitors offering aggressive introductory pricing and bundled deals regularly pull customers away from incumbents. In Q1 2024, T-Mobile reported a net growth of 405,000 broadband subscribers, a spike partially attributed to targeted $30 per month promotional rates for qualifying households. These short-term discounts create enough incentive for price-conscious users to switch—especially in regions with multiple providers.

WOW!'s fixed broadband packages, in contrast, average $60 to $70 monthly after promotional periods end. Without matching offers or loyalty rewards, retention tactics fall flat against rivals using flash incentives bundled with mobile or streaming services.

Frustration Over Speed and Network Capacity

As households grow more digitally dense—think video calls, cloud gaming, and content streaming—network speed and capacity have transformed from luxuries to daily necessities. Subscribers expect advertised Mbps to remain consistent across devices and time zones. When actual throughput fails to meet expectations, especially in upload performance during Zoom-heavy workdays, frustration builds quickly.

Ookla’s Q4 2023 U.S. Speedtest Intelligence report showed median download speeds for fixed broadband at 219 Mbps nationally. In contrast, some WOW! service regions reported averages under 100 Mbps, creating a performance gap that spurred dissatisfaction. GCI’s rural Alaska infrastructure faces similar challenges, particularly where cable overlays haven't been upgraded to fiber.

Timing Matters: Churn and Seasonal Usage Patterns

Patterns of churn often align with transitional life phases—start of a school year, tax season, or job changes. Parents working from home demand higher reliability in September; students expect symmetrical bandwidth by mid-August. If a service falters exactly when needs peak, patience evaporates.

Providers with proactive network planning—raising capacity in Q3 ahead of back-to-school surges—retained more users than those reacting post-complaint. Customers rarely forget connectivity failures during critical moments, and such breakdowns often become the last straw that accelerates attrition.

Customers leaving WOW! and Liberty's GCI aren't just looking for cheaper plans—they're chasing reliability, responsiveness, and performance that meets their changing digital routines. When these expectations are unmet, churn doesn't just rise; it accelerates.

Connectivity in the Classroom: Broadband’s Role in Education and Equity

Uneven Signals: Connectivity Challenges Across Rural School Districts

Reliable internet access directly shapes the quality of education students receive, especially in remote and rural regions of the Mountain West. In Idaho, Utah, and Wyoming, sparse population density combines with rugged geography to make broadband deployment costly and uneven. While urban students typically connect without barriers, many rural learners face unstable or insufficient service.

According to the 2023 Education SuperHighway report, 28% of rural households in Wyoming lack high-speed broadband access. In Idaho and Utah, those numbers stand at 24% and 19%, respectively. This digital divide limits access to digital curriculum, virtual tutoring, and remote assignments, widening the gulf between urban and rural educational opportunity.

The Homework Gap: Broadband's Unequal Reach

The “homework gap” describes the disconnect between students who can complete internet-based homework at home and those who cannot. Nationally, Pew Research Center data indicates that 15% of U.S. households with school-age children lack high-speed internet. That percentage can climb above 30% in certain rural areas of these three states. Without reliable service, students often rely on public Wi-Fi in libraries, fast-food outlets, or school parking lots — a patchwork solution that stunts academic progress.

Subscriber losses, such as WOW! shedding 4,500 broadband customers and Liberty’s GCI losing 900, may reflect not only market churn but also deeper infrastructure issues. In underserved communities, any downturn in subscriber base could trigger cuts in service scope, delay network upgrades, or deter new educational partnerships from materializing.

ISP-School Collaborations: Potential vs. Delivery

Internet service providers often publicize education inclusion programs, but reach remains inconsistent. For example:

Some districts partner with local ISPs to install Wi-Fi routers on school buses or create community access points in churches and community centers. While helpful, these measures only partially close the learning deficit. They depend on ISPs’ willingness to participate and sustain deployments despite fluctuating subscriber revenue.

Where Broadband Shrinks, So Does Learning Potential

Connectivity remains the foundation for digital learning. For students in Idaho’s Salmon River basin, Utah’s Uintah Basin, or Wyoming’s Big Horn County, that signal can mean the difference between online enrichment and academic isolation. As ISPs lose subscribers and shift investment strategies, the impact reaches beyond TV packages or streaming. It lands squarely in classrooms, study halls, and homes — shaping the future of education, one connection at a time.

Streaming and Bandwidth: Changing Subscriber Behavior

Streaming Demand Is Reshaping the Network

From early morning news briefings on YouTube to late-night binge sessions on Netflix, streaming now dominates daily bandwidth consumption. Cisco’s Annual Internet Report (2018–2023) projected video to comprise 82% of all Internet traffic by 2022. That forecast materialized ahead of schedule, pushing ISPs to manage unprecedented data volumes across residential networks.

As subscribers replace cable packages with streaming apps, their expectations shift. Consumers favor consistent high-speed connectivity over bundled channels. For providers like WOW! and GCI, legacy infrastructure wasn’t scaled to prioritize symmetric upload/download speeds — a gap quickly exposed by 4K streaming, multi-device households, and game streaming platforms like Twitch and GeForce NOW.

From Cable to OTT: Where Churn Accelerates

Over-the-top (OTT) platforms such as Hulu, Disney+, and Apple TV+ have restructured consumer viewing habits. This migration away from traditional cable services strips broadband providers of once-sticky bundle incentives. According to Leichtman Research’s 2023 report, 54% of U.S. adults now use at least four OTT services, up from just 28% in 2018. The more flexible the streaming environment becomes, the easier it is for customers to reassess and cancel broadband subscriptions.

For WOW!, dropping 4,500 broadband subscribers isn’t just a symptom of macroeconomic conditions—it reflects a service model outpaced by consumer needs. Liberty’s GCI losing 900 customers in the same period reinforces the trend: regions with high media consumption and rising OTT penetration will disproportionately test the responsiveness of ISPs.

Subscriber Churn Mirrors Streaming Adoption

Households with multiple streaming subscriptions are more likely to reassess broadband plans due to performance frustrations. A 2023 Parks Associates study linked subscriber churn directly to inconsistent speed and buffering during peak hours. The delta between perceived speed and delivered service now sits at the center of retention battles. WOW! and GCI witness this firsthand as their service footprints face intense scrutiny from digitally-savvy users.

The takeaway: user behavior aligns increasingly with OTT content preferences. When networks lag, subscribers walk. Faster, symmetrical speeds don’t attract clients anymore—they’re baseline expectations born from a streaming-first world.

The Competitive Landscape: An Evolving Industry

New Entrants, Shifting Dynamics

Local and regional broadband providers have intensified competition across the Mountain West, accelerating the subscriber losses for established players like WOW! and GCI. As of Q1 2024, Lumen Technologies has reinforced its position through targeted FTTH (Fiber to the Home) upgrades across Colorado and northern Utah. Meanwhile, Ziply Fiber—a comparatively smaller but agile provider—continues installing fiber in underserved pockets of Idaho, progressively shifting the loyalty of former GCI household users.

Starlink, SpaceX's satellite internet service, complicates the terrain further. Offering speeds around 100 Mbps to 220 Mbps and latency as low as 25 ms in parts of Idaho and Wyoming, Starlink has drawn in rural users with no traditional cable infrastructure. The Freedom to Operate from fixed infrastructure constraints has allowed Starlink to deploy service across Western states more rapidly than legacy ISPs expanding fiber or coaxial lines.

Municipal Networks Carving a Niche

Several towns in Utah and Wyoming have initiated municipally-owned broadband projects—driven by voters demanding lower prices and greater reliability. In Ammon, Idaho, the open-access fiber network allows residents to switch ISPs in real-time via a public portal. That flexibility directly challenges the conventional long-term contracts used by private-sector ISPs. Other towns such as Fort Collins, Colorado and Bozeman, Montana have launched similar initiatives, financed through bonds with public utility oversight.

These networks frequently price below regional averages, with packages ranging from $30–$60/month for symmetrical gigabit service. The value proposition—local control, reinvestment of profits into infrastructure, and transparent governance—continues to draw consumers away from incumbents with less flexible service models.

Regulatory Winds: Tilting the Balance

Policy changes across federal and state institutions are also reshaping competitive conditions. The Affordable Connectivity Program (ACP), introduced by the FCC, provides eligible households with up to $30 per month toward broadband, and $75 for those on Tribal lands—reshaping price sensitivity and emphasizing service quality as the new competitive frontier.

At the same time, states like Utah and Idaho are evaluating legislation to streamline the permitting process for municipal fiber expansions, following lobbying efforts from rural townships. The resulting acceleration in public–private partnerships will alter market access rules and give rise to hybrid models that extend fiber into low-population zones previously considered commercially nonviable.

In response, larger ISPs will need to recalibrate; price alone no longer guarantees retention. Who delivers broadband isn't just about bandwidth anymore—residents now factor in ownership, sustainability, and adaptability. Which providers can meet those expectations before rural consumers cut the cord altogether?

Infrastructure Outlook: Investment or Retreat?

Slowing Momentum in Capital Commitments

Both WOW! and Liberty Broadband’s recent subscriber losses — 4,500 and 900 respectively — mirror a growing hesitancy in infrastructure expansion. While WOW!’s capital expenditures peaked in 2021 at $396 million, investment shrank significantly to $248 million by 2023, according to its annual reports. Liberty Broadband, via its GCI unit, shows a similar retreat, with infrastructure updates in Alaska tapering off after major initial outlays in the early 2020s.

Project announcements have quieted. WOW!’s network upgrades to DOCSIS 3.1, once central to its growth narrative, are now largely complete. GCI’s 5G plans remain concentrated in Anchorage, without volume deployments in the more rural pockets of the Mountain West. This pullback in investment aligns directly with reduced subscriber anticipation and growing competition from fixed wireless and LEO satellite providers.

Are Federal Programs Filling the Void?

Public funding, especially from the Broadband Equity, Access, and Deployment (BEAD) program and the Rural Digital Opportunity Fund (RDOF), is designed to stimulate infrastructure investments in under- and unserved regions. Idaho, Utah, and Wyoming — with low population density and rugged terrain — are among the states relying most heavily on these programs to extend coverage.

Despite these funds, neither WOW! nor Liberty Broadband has announced major new projects tied to BEAD or RDOF awards in these states. Instead, local cooperatives and electric utility providers — entities like Silver Star Communications in Wyoming or Strata Networks in Utah — are becoming more active recipients and deployers.

Looking Ahead: Fiber or 5G?

Fiber remains the benchmark for high-capacity broadband, yet its cost per mile in sparsely populated states can exceed $40,000, especially across mountainous or federally protected land. This has created openings for 5G fixed wireless to emerge as a faster-to-deploy alternative, championed heavily by T-Mobile and Verizon in Idaho Falls, Provo, and Cheyenne.

GCI leans heavily into fiber-to-the-home (FTTH) in its Alaskan markets but has not expanded those ambitions into the Mountain West. WOW!, traditionally focused on coaxial networks upgraded via DOCSIS, has not committed to any regional fiber deployments in the recent filings. Merged-caliber infrastructure plays are not yet materializing across the board.

Is a larger shift underway? Consider this: when incumbents halt investment and defer to third-party providers or wait for public grants, infrastructure gaps remain — or widen. In this uncertain pipeline, customers look elsewhere, and churn compounds. Who will accelerate deployment in these underserved zones, and who will retreat further? The next 12 to 18 months will unveil more than internal press releases — they’ll reveal who’s still serious about broadband infrastructure in the heartland.

Forging Stability in a Volatile Broadband Market

Subscriber losses like WOW!'s 4,500 drop and GCI's 900-user decline don’t occur in a vacuum. Competitive pricing, service quality, and shifting consumption patterns clearly dictated by streaming and educational access have created a pressure landscape. Providers operating in Idaho, Utah, and Wyoming now face a recalibrated equation—where network reach meets digital expectations.

Is it purely about speed? Not anymore. Reliability, affordability, and localized customer support have emerged as core differentiators. The Mountain West, with patchy infrastructure and underserved rural counties, presents unique challenges. When a student in Fremont County misses a homework deadline due to buffering Zoom classes, the broadband narrative moves beyond numbers—it becomes personal.

To reverse these losses, ISPs will need more than price promotions. They will need deliberate, long-term planning involving infrastructure renewal, public-private educational Internet deals, and scalable upgrades in fiber optics. Aligning with rural schools and municipal planning offices can create inroads into households that have been historically offline or underserved. Providers that step into that space will recapture loyalty and growth.

Relying on temporary subsidies or waiting out the market trajectory will not yield stability. Data from the most recent FCC Form 477 filings support this—regions with sustained investment in fiber and fixed wireless upgrades saw subscriber increases, even amid national downturns. Equitable access policies also correlate with higher school performance indicators, particularly in underfunded districts in central Utah and southeastern Idaho.

How do providers secure ground in such a shifting terrain? Through reinvestment, regional listening, and prioritizing digital equity in their service models. Those who do will shape the next chapter of broadband in the Mountain West—not by reacting to churn, but by outpacing it.