Call: 1-877-697-2926

MPLS vs. VPN: Which One Should You Use and When (2025)?

As organizations evolve toward distributed workforces, cloud-centric architectures, and data-driven operations, network infrastructure must deliver more than just connectivity. It must scale with demand, safeguard sensitive information, and support seamless access across multiple locations and platforms. Cloud services drive bandwidth consumption, while remote workforces challenge traditional perimeter-based security. In this environment, choosing the right networking architecture isn't just a technical decision—it directly affects agility and performance.

The conversation has intensified around two frequently adopted solutions: MPLS (Multiprotocol Label Switching) and VPN (Virtual Private Network). Both are used to connect geographically dispersed offices securely, but they differ in architecture, cost, reliability, and the level of control offered. The question on every IT manager’s desk: where does each one excel, and when should one be chosen over the other?

This guide breaks down the strengths and limitations of MPLS and VPNs to help IT professionals and decision-makers determine which solution aligns with their operational demands and long-term goals.

Understanding MPLS: How Multiprotocol Label Switching Actually Works

Definition and Core Mechanism

Multiprotocol Label Switching (MPLS) is a traffic routing technique that governs how data moves through a network. Instead of relying on destination IP addresses to make forwarding decisions, MPLS uses predetermined labels. These labels are short, fixed-length identifiers inserted between the Layer 2 (data link) and Layer 3 (network) headers. By doing this, MPLS establishes a path across the network even before data packets are transmitted.

Here's how it works: Once data enters an MPLS-enabled network, the first router—known as the Label Edge Router (LER)—assigns a label based on forwarding equivalence class (FEC). Each subsequent router, or Label Switching Router (LSR), forwards the packet based on its label, not the IP header. This tight control eliminates the need for each router to perform a complex routing table lookup, reducing delay and packet loss.

Layer 2.5 in the OSI Model

MPLS doesn't fit neatly into the OSI model. It doesn't operate strictly at Layer 2 or Layer 3. Instead, it functions in what network engineers often refer to as Layer 2.5. Positioned between the data link and network layers, this hybrid role allows MPLS to transport data across different Layer 2 technologies—like Ethernet, Frame Relay, or ATM—while maintaining IP-based intelligence.

Telecommunications Carrier Service

Service providers typically manage MPLS networks. Enterprises partner with these providers—such as AT&T, Verizon, or BT—to establish private, high-performance WAN connectivity between multiple geographic locations. Since MPLS uses dedicated infrastructure and committed service level agreements (SLAs), providers can customize Quality of Service (QoS) parameters to match workload needs across critical applications.

Performance Advantages

Looking to understand how Virtual Private Networks compare? Let's examine how a VPN functions and where it stands relative to MPLS.

Understanding VPN: Virtual Private Network Demystified

Definition and Encrypted Tunnel Over the Internet

Unlike MPLS, which builds private paths through provider-controlled networks, a VPN (Virtual Private Network) establishes a secure, encrypted tunnel across the public Internet between a user and a remote network. This tunnel prevents unauthorized access by masking IP addresses and encrypting transmitted data.

The encryption process hides the content of the communication, making it unintelligible to intermediaries such as ISPs, cybercriminals, or surveillance agencies. Whether you're connecting from a hotel in Berlin or a satellite office in Singapore, the tunnel delivers a secure link to your organization’s network.

Encryption Protocols: A Closer Look at IPsec

VPNs commonly use the IPsec (Internet Protocol Security) suite to encrypt and authenticate each IP packet of a communication session. IPsec operates in two modes:

Through a combination of symmetric and asymmetric encryption methods, IPsec ensures data confidentiality, integrity, and authentication. Additional VPN protocols such as OpenVPN, L2TP, and IKEv2 are frequently layered on top to enhance connection reliability and compatibility.

Types of VPN: Site-to-Site and Remote-Access

VPNs fall into two primary categories, each addressing different connectivity needs:

Benefits: Cost-Efficiency, Flexibility, and Scalability

VPNs offer clear financial advantages. They run over the public Internet, eliminating the need for costly dedicated circuits. Businesses avoid the expense of physical infrastructure while maintaining a secure connection model.

This approach also supports rapid scalability. Add new users or locations without waiting for hardware installations or provider coordination. Open a new office—or hire a remote team—and get them securely connected within hours.

The flexibility to connect anyone, anywhere, and the ability to scale with minimal overhead makes VPNs the go-to for hybrid workforces, agile development teams, and fast-growing organizations.

Key Differences between MPLS and VPN

Foundational Technology: Labels vs. Encrypted Tunnels

MPLS and VPN diverge sharply at the protocol level. MPLS relies on packet labeling to route data through predetermined paths across a private network. These labels, inserted into each packet, dictate its journey from source to destination without relying on traditional IP lookups at every hop. As a result, routers using MPLS operate more efficiently because they process label information instead of performing resource-intensive route calculations.

By contrast, a VPN uses encryption tunneling protocols—such as IPsec, OpenVPN, or WireGuard—to encapsulate and encrypt data packets before transmitting them over a public network. The destination server decrypts the data and routes it to its intended location. This model focuses on privacy and securing traffic, not optimizing routing paths or traffic management in the same way MPLS does.

Network Medium: Private Lines vs. Public Internet

VPNs function over the public Internet, leveraging existing infrastructure to create secure communication tunnels. Because of this, VPN connections inherit the reliability, speed, and latency characteristics of the underlying Internet service. Congestion, routing inefficiencies, and ISP-level disruptions can directly affect performance.

MPLS networks don’t involve public infrastructure. Data travels over a dedicated private WAN controlled by a service provider. This configuration avoids Internet-based volatility and supports predictable latency and throughput. MPLS behaves like a managed roadway with controlled entry points, whereas a VPN navigates the chaotic traffic of open highways.

Router Behavior and Performance Impact

MPLS changes how routers interpret data. Instead of referring to complex routing tables, routers read short, fixed-length labels. This not only reduces CPU load on routers but also enables consistent quality of service (QoS) policies—such as prioritized traffic for voice or video streams—which are enforced at the packet level.

VPN routers, in contrast, must perform encryption, decryption, and IP-based routing lookups for every packet. This process places a heavier computational burden on edge devices, especially under high data loads. Because the VPN lacks the label-switching optimization of MPLS, it can't match its consistency in delivering latency-sensitive traffic under load.

The distinction comes down to control and visibility. MPLS offers traffic engineering and fine-grained route control. VPNs provide encrypted access over a more accessible but less deterministic transport layer.

How Do MPLS and VPN Compare on Performance and Speed?

MPLS Handles Real-Time Traffic with Minimal Latency

Multiprotocol Label Switching (MPLS) routes traffic using predetermined, label-switched paths that avoid unnecessary hops. This design contributes to significantly lower latency and jitter, making MPLS the preferred option for latency-sensitive applications like VoIP, video conferencing, and financial trading systems. MPLS also supports Quality of Service (QoS) mechanisms that prioritize high-priority traffic over less critical packets. As a result, time-sensitive data receives consistent bandwidth and reduced transit delays.

VPN Performance Depends on the Public Internet

VPNs operate over the public internet, leveraging IPsec or SSL tunnels to encrypt traffic between endpoints. Because the internet doesn't guarantee traffic prioritization or path optimization, VPN traffic competes with general consumer data. Performance varies based on ISP quality, routing conditions, network congestion, and the end-user's hardware and firmware.

Consumer-grade routers or oversubscribed circuits can throttle throughput, introduce higher latency, or cause packet fragmentation. These conditions may remain unnoticed during casual web browsing but become burdensome under high-throughput tasks such as remote desktop sessions or cloud-based CAD applications.

VPN Encryption Adds Processing Overhead

End-to-end encryption ensures security across VPN tunnels, but it incurs a computational cost not present in MPLS flows. This overhead affects performance, especially when legacy hardware or low-power devices are involved. For example, AES-256 encryption, commonly used in IPsec, allocates CPU cycles per packet, increasing device load during peak traffic periods. Performance degrades further when multiple tunnels operate simultaneously or when encryption happens in software rather than hardware-assisted modules.

Common Problem Scenarios in VPN Deployments

Want to test the difference yourself? Run a ping or traceroute from your VPN-connected device during peak hours, then compare with MPLS metrics on a dedicated circuit. The difference in performance surfaces quickly, especially for time-critical tasks.

Security Analysis: How MPLS and VPN Stack Up

MPLS: Secure by Design, But Not by Encryption

MPLS operates within a service provider’s private network infrastructure, offering a high level of control and traffic segregation. This physical isolation reduces the risk of external threats, as there's no exposure to the public internet during data transmission. However, the protocol itself lacks built-in encryption. If traffic confidentiality is required—especially in regulatory-sensitive sectors—additional protective layers such as MACsec or IPsec must be manually added atop the MPLS backbone.

Because MPLS routes packets using labels rather than IP headers, it becomes inherently harder for external attackers to launch man-in-the-middle attacks or sniff data—unless they gain access to the provider’s core infrastructure. That said, an MPLS path is only as secure as the service provider’s physical infrastructure and operational practices.

VPN: Encryption as a Core Feature

Unlike MPLS, VPNs—particularly those based on the IPsec protocol—apply encryption to every packet. IPsec secures data traffic between endpoints by authenticating and encrypting each IP packet in a communication session. This guarantees data confidentiality and integrity regardless of the network being used, even unsecured public internet.

VPN endpoints, typically enterprise firewalls or client software, initiate tunnels that encrypt the entire payload. This means data remains shielded not just from outside threats but also from intermediate ISPs and infrastructure operators.

Comparing Exposure to Threats

MPLS circuits, managed within a provider-controlled environment, face low risk from common internet-based attacks—such as DDoS or route hijacking—by virtue of their closed architecture. Still, insider threats or misconfigurations at the carrier level can nullify these benefits. Moreover, without encryption, sensitive data in transit remains theoretically accessible under breach conditions.

VPNs introduce exposure to public network attacks, including IP spoofing, session hijacking, and packet injection. However, their defense comes built-in: robust encryption protocols like IKEv2/IPsec or OpenVPN neutralize those threats by encapsulating data within secure tunnels. Thus, despite operating over inherently less secure channels, VPNs can achieve strong confidentiality and integrity guarantees.

Provider Capabilities and Add-On Security Services

Security outcomes also hinge on the service provider’s capabilities. MPLS providers often offer SLAs with embedded security features—like route segregation, firewall-as-a-service, or optional IPsec overlays. Enterprise-grade VPN service providers may bundle VPN concentrators, real-time traffic inspection, and zero-trust integrations to extend protections to all endpoints.

Evaluating MPLS vs. VPN from a security angle isn't about one winner—it’s about context. Do you trust a carrier-managed infrastructure, or do you demand full control of encryption keys and protocols? Are users on public Wi-Fi or within a physically protected campus? Each environment demands a deliberate security match.

Weighing the Costs: MPLS vs. VPN

MPLS Pricing: Premium Service, Premium Cost

MPLS operates within a proprietary ecosystem managed by service providers. This model delivers low latency and high reliability, but it comes with a significant financial commitment. Monthly service fees typically scale with distance, bandwidth, and the number of circuit endpoints. According to TeleGeography’s 2023 WAN Manager Survey, the median monthly cost of a 100 Mbps MPLS circuit in North America hovered around $1,200, with international links increasing sharply in cost.

Deployment requires not just the circuit itself but also provider-managed customer edge (CE) routers, which are often leased or rolled into service contracts. Factor in provisioning times between 30 to 90 days and additional costs for Quality of Service (QoS) configurations or SLAs, and the total monthly expenditure per site can easily surpass $1,500.

VPN: Cost-Efficient Access via Public Infrastructure

VPNs leverage existing internet infrastructure, eliminating the need for dedicated circuits. The main costs arise from equipment upgrades, software licenses, and management overhead. A business can establish a full-mesh site-to-site VPN on commercial-grade broadband connections—with a 100 Mbps business-class fiber link averaging $100–$300/month—offering enormous cost reductions versus MPLS.

Deploying VPN over internet connections cuts operational expenditure dramatically. Even after factoring in firewall appliances, encryption-capable routers, or cloud-based SD-WAN solutions, total costs can remain under 25% of comparable MPLS deployments.

Budgeting Strategies by Business Size

Hidden Costs That Shape Long-Term Budgets

Start with hardware: older routers lacking AES-NI acceleration drastically underperform with encrypted VPN tunnels, forcing upgrades. Then consider software licensing—some enterprise VPN solutions charge per concurrent tunnel or endpoint, pushing annual costs into five figures even before WAN optimization is layered in.

IT support adds another dimension. MPLS includes carrier-grade troubleshooting and service monitoring. VPN setups shift that responsibility inward, often necessitating in-house or contracted network engineers. A managed service provider may bill $100–$200/hour for advanced VPN diagnostics.

Bandwidth expenditure also climbs with VPN traffic, particularly in cloud-heavy environments. Unlike MPLS, which often includes bandwidth shaping and QoS guarantees, VPN over broadband needs deliberate capacity planning to avoid congestion during peak use.

When MPLS Is the Right Fit: Business Scenarios That Demand It

Enterprise Branch Office Connections with Consistent Performance Needs

Organizations running multiple branch offices across regions depend heavily on predictable network behavior. MPLS supports deterministic routing, which means data packets always take the same predefined path. As a result, performance remains steady, regardless of traffic load.

For example, retail chains with hundreds of locations use MPLS to connect point-of-sale systems, inventory databases, and customer data platforms back to central data centers. This uniform performance simplifies network management and removes latency-related troubleshooting from daily operations.

Businesses Running Real-Time Applications

Real-time workloads—voice over IP (VoIP), video conferencing, and live data feeds—suffer when latency or jitter spikes. MPLS eliminates these disruptions by assigning guaranteed bandwidth and prioritizing specific traffic types using Class of Service (CoS).

Financial firms and healthcare providers rely on MPLS to ensure seamless real-time communication. A telemedicine network using MPLS can guarantee uninterrupted video consultations and real-time access to electronic health records without performance degradation.

Highly-Regulated Industries Requiring Constant Uptime and Data Assurance

In sectors like finance, healthcare, and energy, uptime isn’t a preference—it’s mandatory. MPLS offers Service Level Agreements (SLAs) that guarantee uptime, packet delivery ratio, and round-trip latency. These metrics aren’t just regulatory necessities; they directly impact operational continuity and customer trust.

The banking sector, for instance, uses MPLS to meet compliance requirements set by regulations such as PCI DSS. Similarly, pharmaceutical companies connect R&D facilities through MPLS networks to ensure data integrity across research applications and manufacturing controls.

Need to support multiple office locations with performance that doesn’t fluctuate minute-to-minute? Running time-sensitive communication tools or navigating strict data compliance rules? In each case, MPLS provides reliability and structure not easily matched by consumer-grade VPN services.

Situations Where VPN Offers the Most Value

Remote Workforce Enablement and BYOD Environments

VPNs handle the security challenges of a remote and distributed workforce without inflating IT infrastructure costs. Companies allowing employees to work from home or use personal devices—common in bring-your-own-device (BYOD) policies—can integrate VPNs into their access protocols to authenticate connections and encrypt all traffic over public networks. This enables teams in multiple time zones to securely access internal systems without relying on costly, hardware-centric solutions.

Unlike MPLS, which connects predefined locations through carrier-managed circuits, VPNs support any device with an internet connection. They integrate well with cloud platforms like AWS, Microsoft Azure, and Google Cloud, all of which support VPN tunnels for secure access to virtual private clouds (VPCs).

Cost-Effective Deployment for Startups and SMEs

Launching a dedicated MPLS network involves provisioning provider circuits, coordinating with ISPs, and leasing hardware—which drives up capital investment. VPNs avoid this entirely. Startups and small to medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) use VPNs to build secure connection layers over existing broadband or fiber internet, saving thousands annually in infrastructure costs.

Temporary or Mobile Sites Needing Secure Data Transmission

Construction locations, pop-up retail outlets, touring operations, and disaster response zones all operate in environments where permanent networking isn’t feasible. MPLS fails in these contexts due to its dependency on fixed-line connections and complex provisioning timelines. VPN enables rapid setup using whatever internet connectivity is available—from mobile hotspots to satellite uplinks.

Data transmission remains encrypted, shielding proprietary documents, real-time video feeds, and sensitive customer data from interception. For example, a healthcare mobile unit collecting patient data in rural areas can use a VPN to upload records directly into the central hospital EMR system, maintaining compliance with HIPAA encryption standards.

Scalability and Flexibility: Matching Network Growth with Business Needs

MPLS: Scaling Depends on the Provider

MPLS networks operate within the boundaries defined by the service provider. Expanding an MPLS environment involves negotiations, provisioning times, and often new hardware installations. Unlike a purely software-based solution, MPLS doesn't allow organizations to move or expand independently. Every new branch or remote location typically requires coordination with the provider to extend the MPLS circuit.

Rolling out MPLS to a new site can take weeks. Physical lines must be installed, circuits tested, and routing configured. Moreover, service-level agreements (SLAs) need to be updated. High reliability and QoS controls are preserved, but agility takes a hit.

VPN: Adaptable, Software-Driven Growth

VPNs, especially cloud-compatible solutions like IPsec or SSL VPNs, allow network expansion without relying on telecom infrastructure. Add a remote worker? Send credentials and roll out client software. Open a new location? Internet access and a compatible VPN gateway do the job.

With cloud-native VPN architectures, organizations extend their private networks using public internet — securely and elastically.

Cloud Integration: MPLS Lags Behind

Cloud-centric operations demand dynamic connectivity, but MPLS routes traffic through fixed endpoints. Direct cloud access — such as connecting to AWS or Microsoft Azure — often requires third-party services like ExpressRoute or Direct Connect, which add cost and complexity. Latency improvements come at the expense of flexibility.

Cloud-integrated VPNs offer configurable virtual routers, allowing rapid provisioning of resources across regions. Businesses working in DevOps cycles or with frequent infrastructure changes naturally align with these capabilities.

Routing and IP Expansion Dynamics

Extending MPLS forces organizations to adopt IP addressing schemes consistent with carrier-managed routes. Routing protocols like BGP must be manually tuned to prevent route conflicts or suboptimal paths. This dependency hampers autonomous adjustments.

VPNs use private IP schemes under the control of the organization. With tools like dynamic DNS, NAT traversal, and cloud-based route orchestration, VPN networks self-adapt. That autonomy creates breathing room for organic growth.

Wondering which option grows with your business ambitions? Think about who controls your routing tables and how fast you can alter them. MPLS provides control — but not to you. VPNs hand over the keys, and with the right design, they scale with every move you make.

Making the Right Choice Between MPLS and VPN

The contrast between MPLS and VPN lies in how they handle data transport, security, performance, and cost. MPLS delivers guaranteed bandwidth, predictable latency, and high reliability—elements that large enterprises with latency-sensitive applications prioritize. VPNs, on the other hand, offer quick deployment, lower setup costs, and secure connectivity across public networks, making them a strong fit for smaller teams, remote workers, or dispersed workforces.

MPLS shines in environments where uptime and deterministic traffic flow are non-negotiable. Think of financial institutions, telecom carriers, and healthcare networks. VPN suits flexible, cloud-friendly operations where direct internet access, financial efficiency, and rapid scaling are bigger concerns—such as software startups, consulting firms, or distributed marketing teams.

No single architecture can serve every scenario equally well. The right setup depends on workload criticality, branch office presence, compliance demands, and available technical resources. Some organizations gain an operational edge by combining both: MPLS forms the backbone of their core data routing while VPN extends secure access to contractors, mobile professionals, or field offices. That blended strategy supports both resilience and agility.

What kind of data are you transmitting? Where are your users located? How mission-critical are your workloads? These questions shape the right network architecture more accurately than any generic recommendation can. Evaluate network needs in connection with business goals—and let that drive your infrastructure decisions.