Fiber Expansion Strong Despite BEAD Delays (2025)
The national focus on broadband infrastructure has never been sharper. With digital equity and economic competitiveness tied directly to internet access, federal and state agencies have prioritized closing connectivity gaps—especially across underserved and rural areas. At the center of this agenda lies the Broadband Equity, Access, and Deployment (BEAD) program, a $42.5 billion federal initiative designed to fund high-speed internet projects across the United States.
However, despite its scale and intent, the rollout of BEAD funding has encountered a series of administrative and regulatory delays. One might expect these bottlenecks to halt fiber builds on the ground, yet the opposite is unfolding. Across states, fiber expansion projects are gaining momentum—with or without BEAD dollars.
This analysis examines the drivers behind ongoing fiber investment and deployment: from private capital and state-level policy to workforce dynamics and supply chain conditions. It explores why fiber builds continue to outpace expectations, even as federal money lingers in the pipeline, and what this means for the future shape of America’s telecommunications infrastructure.
Launched under the Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act (IIJA) of 2021, the Broadband Equity, Access, and Deployment (BEAD) Program stands as the largest federal investment in broadband in U.S. history. Managed by the National Telecommunications and Information Administration (NTIA), BEAD allocates a total of $42.5 billion with a singular mission: deliver reliable, affordable high-speed internet to unserved and underserved communities nationwide.
BEAD aims to close longstanding gaps in internet accessibility. The program prioritizes deployment in areas where more than 80% of households lack access to internet speeds of at least 100 Mbps download and 20 Mbps upload. That threshold aligns with the FCC’s minimum speed definition for high-speed internet service. BEAD funding will allow states to subsidize infrastructure builds where private investment alone wouldn't be financially viable.
For millions of Americans—especially those in rural, tribal, and low-income urban areas—internet connectivity remains fragmented or nonexistent. BEAD targets these connectivity deserts. By funding last-mile infrastructure, the program directly addresses affordability, accessibility, and adoption barriers. The goal is not merely availability, but meaningful access: internet service capable of supporting modern applications from telehealth to distance learning.
Although all 56 states and territories have received their program allocations—ranging from $27 million in territories like the U.S. Virgin Islands to over $3.3 billion in Texas—no community has yet broken ground using BEAD funds as of early 2024. These delays have not stalled momentum in the private or municipal sectors, but they underscore the complexity of leveraging federal resources at scale.
Fiber broadband delivers internet through fiber-optic cables that transmit data using light signals. Unlike traditional copper lines or coaxial networks, fiber offers symmetrical upload and download speeds, drastically lower latency, and far greater bandwidth capacity. This enables consistent performance even during peak usage hours, making it the only infrastructure currently capable of supporting long-term digital demand growth without major upgrades.
In practical terms, users on fiber networks can stream 4K media, support remote work, run smart home systems, and access cloud applications without bottlenecks. These characteristics firmly position fiber as the infrastructure of choice for next-generation connectivity.
The BEAD (Broadband Equity, Access, and Deployment) program, passed under the Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act, promises $42.45 billion to expand broadband access, but actual disbursement remains delayed. Nonetheless, fiber deployment continues advancing, powered by investor-backed commitments, market demand, and state-level initiatives.
According to the Fiber Broadband Association’s 2023 mid-year update, more than 9.1 million fiber passings were added in 2022, with the momentum carrying into 2023. The update confirmed that by mid-2023, over 68 million homes and businesses in the U.S. had access to fiber services. Despite the lack of BEAD distributions, construction crews have laid tens of thousands of new route miles across multiple states, especially in underserved markets.
Major internet service providers have not waited on government funds to begin expanding. Rather than pausing to see how BEAD allocations shake out, they’ve pressed forward with privately financed builds. For example:
Fiber builds are surging in traditionally underserved rural areas, but suburban communities also show sweeping activity. Suburbs positioned near metro areas—particularly in the Southeast, Midwest, and Intermountain West—have emerged as top targets for accelerated fiber construction.
In states such as Tennessee, Ohio, and Utah, regional providers and cooperatives have seized this moment. Networks are expanding into fast-growing suburbs where hybrid fiber-coaxial networks no longer meet the needs of hybrid workforces and data-heavy households. In place of partial upgrades, providers are leapfrogging legacy infrastructure in favor of all-fiber networks with gigabit capabilities.
How many miles of fiber will be laid before BEAD funding hits the ground? That depends on steel, labor, and permits—but none of those are stopping the surge yet.
Several of the nation's largest internet service providers are scaling their broadband buildouts using private capital at an accelerated pace. In 2023, AT&T earmarked over $24 billion in capital investment, with a significant portion funneled into expanding its fiber network. Charter Communications reported over 1.3 million new fiber passings for the year, and Lumen Technologies continued its Quantum Fiber expansion into new and legacy markets.
These moves are not stopgaps. They represent a long-term strategy by ISPs to position themselves competitively in both urban and underserved rural markets—BEAD funding or not.
Instead of waiting for BEAD disbursements to materialize, many ISPs are realigning deployment plans to mirror potential BEAD-eligible zones. This approach enhances their likelihood of locking down future funding while demonstrating a proactive footprint. By doing so, companies like Frontier and Altafiber strengthen their bids, but also show state broadband offices measurable progress on fiber service availability.
In several states—including Texas, Georgia, and Ohio—providers have already submitted detailed co-investment proposals and begun shovel-ready builds that anticipate BEAD allocations but aren’t dependent on them.
While national carriers grab headlines, regional ISPs have been quietly accelerating fiber deployment plans tailored to community-specific geography and demand. For example:
These rollouts emphasize symmetrical gigabit speeds and long-term scalability, rather than patchwork stopgaps using interim technologies like DSL or fixed wireless.
Every mile of fiber laid prior to full BEAD rollout enhances an ISP’s future standing. Fiber availability opens doors to anchor institutions, new residential developments, and enterprise clients—helping providers monetize infrastructure immediately. Moreover, pre-BEAD deployment sends a clear signal to regulators: this provider has skin in the game.
ISPs advancing without waiting position themselves to dominate post-BEAD allocations, outcompeting late movers. Infrastructure built with private investment today puts these companies in direct negotiations tomorrow, with a footprint already operational and proven.
While the BEAD program garners much of the spotlight, its slower-than-anticipated rollout has not paused fiber buildouts. A network of other federal and state programs are offsetting funding lags, enabling projects to forge ahead. Chief among them: the American Rescue Plan Act (ARPA), the USDA’s ReConnect Program, and a growing wave of state-led digital equity initiatives.
ARPA allocated $350 billion through the State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds (SLFRF). From that pool, billions have been channeled into broadband expansion. States like Maine, Virginia, and New Mexico tapped SLFRF to fund last-mile fiber and improve rural connectivity.
ARPA’s flexibility has given states freedom to fill immediate infrastructure gaps without waiting for BEAD allocations to clear bureaucratic hurdles.
The USDA’s ReConnect Program continues to zero in on rural broadband gaps with targeted grants and loans. Since 2019, it has awarded over $5 billion to deploy fiber in unserved and underserved communities. Round 4 funding, announced in 2023, added $1.15 billion and required applicants to deliver minimum symmetrical speeds of 100 Mbps.
Unlike BEAD, ReConnect prioritizes immediate deliverability and shovel-ready projects. This focus has made it a go-to resource for providers needing quick capital to meet rural deployment goals.
Beyond federal channels, states are independently driving broadband investment with equity at the forefront. Led by dedicated broadband offices, initiatives in states like California, Illinois, and Wisconsin are linking infrastructure to workforce development and affordability goals.
These state programs not only supplement federal delays but also customize deployments to regional needs, creating resilient broadband ecosystems tailored to demographics and terrain.
The cumulative effect of these programs is substantial. While BEAD remains essential for long-term goals, ARPA, ReConnect, and state funds are bridging the short-term gap. Deployment teams aren’t standing still—they’re leveraging layered funding streams to keep projects alive and scaling. In many cases, these combined investments are delivering fiber to neighborhoods that had been overlooked for a decade.
The funding ecosystem has shifted. Instead of relying on one federal pipeline, ISPs and municipalities are weaving together timelines, programs, and capital sources. It's working—and fiber is reaching the ground long before BEAD dollars hit the bank.
While federal funding programs like BEAD remain delayed or underutilized, communities across rural America are refusing to wait. Instead, they're building the infrastructure themselves. In northern Colorado, the town of Estes Park formed Trailblazer Broadband, a municipal internet utility that, by 2023, had connected over 3,000 homes with gigabit-speed fiber. The model proved effective: funded through revenue bonds, the project avoided reliance on sluggish federal timelines.
Down in Appalachia, the Kentucky-based Peoples Rural Telephone Cooperative (PRTC) laid over 1,000 miles of fiber to reach 100% of homes in their service area—even across mountainous terrain. PRTC accomplished this by aggressively seeking a mix of USDA Rural Utilities Service grants and strong community engagement, completing the deployment years ahead of BEAD allocations.
In Minnesota, the RS Fiber cooperative emerged through a joint venture of 10 townships and 17 cities. Residents voted to contribute municipal sales tax revenues and also offered voluntary member investments. Now the region has a scalable, gigabit-capable network. Local ownership ensures that profits are reinvested back into services, not extracted by outside corporations.
These grassroots efforts aren’t about futureproofing—they’re meeting present-day demands. In rural economies, the availability of gigabit fiber directly enables remote work opportunities and business retention. Healthcare providers, especially in geographically isolated zones, use fiber to expand telemedicine reach, allowing continuous patient care without the burden of travel. School districts rely on stable upload speeds to support blended learning models, eliminating disparities between urban and rural students.
The absence of reliable internet reinforces cycles of economic underperformance. Reversing this requires infrastructure that supports high-capacity digital services, and fiber delivers symmetrical speeds and low latency—far superior to legacy DSL and even most fixed wireless deployments.
Securing state or federal dollars often places rural communities in competition with metropolitan areas or requires matching funds they can’t easily access. In response, civic leaders and determined residents are finding pathways forward. Some incorporate non-profit broadband co-ops. Others tap into lesser-known state infrastructure grants or partner with regional electric co-ops that already own utility poles and rights-of-way.
Through local ballot measures, bond issuances, or localized crowdfunding campaigns, communities build customized solutions. These hyperlocal strategies aren’t just effective—they’re fast. Once leadership aligns behind a broadband goal, deployments that would take years under state bureaucracies can break ground in months. As one PRTC spokesperson put it, “Our community got tired of waiting for better internet, so we took matters into our own hands.”
Fiber deployment projects regularly stall—not for lack of funding or technical capacity, but due to drawn-out permitting processes. Providers face a tangle of federal, state, and municipal regulations that seldom align, and approvals often stretch across months or even years. The root problem: fragmented permitting systems that vary dramatically by jurisdiction, undermining speed and consistency in broadband infrastructure rollouts.
Before a single trench is dug or pole is climbed, Internet Service Providers must navigate a maze of environmental compliance reviews. These procedures, especially at the federal level under the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA), add substantial lead time. Simultaneously, utility pole access and make-ready work remain top friction points. Joint-use agreements between utility companies and fiber deployers trigger negotiation stages that can delay timelines by months.
Both federal lawmakers and regulatory agencies have taken notice. In 2023, the Biden administration proposed the Broadband Permitting Efficiency Act, aiming to streamline approvals on federal lands. The FCC’s “Dig Once” policy pushes for infrastructure sharing during road construction, an approach that could lower deployment costs by up to 90% in some rural zones, according to the Government Accountability Office (GAO).
Additionally, the Accelerating Broadband Connectivity Act introduced at the state level in several legislatures is designed to create uniform permitting templates, fixed deadlines for agencies, and expedited appeal processes. Colorado, Arizona, and North Carolina have already piloted regulatory sandboxes to test these streamlined models.
Policy delays have consequences that go far beyond red tape. Without alignment between permitting reforms and national broadband goals, the U.S. risks missing critical milestones. The Biden administration set a target of providing broadband access to all Americans by 2030. Reaching that benchmark requires synchronized federal and state rules, fast-tracked environmental reviews, and a unified approach to infrastructure approvals. Until those systems modernize, the biggest challenge in fiber expansion won’t be laying cable—it’ll be securing permission to do so.
Worldwide demand for fiber optic cable has skyrocketed in the past five years, fueled by aggressive network buildouts across Asia, North America, and Europe. According to CRU Group, global fiber optic cable consumption exceeded 553 million fiber-kilometers in 2022, a 10% increase from 2021. This surge applied pressure on manufacturers, who’ve struggled to maintain production pace amid raw material shortages and geopolitical disruptions.
Delays in optical fiber production—especially in preform manufacturing—have led to longer lead times and volatile pricing. China, home to the bulk of global fiber cable production capacity, curbed exports in 2023 due to domestic deployment goals, adding strain to U.S. supply chains. As a result, U.S. fiber operators have faced procurement delays ranging from a few weeks to over six months, depending on vendor relationships and order sizes.
In parallel, the labor market for broadband construction and telecom installation remains under significant strain. The U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics reports that nearly 30,000 additional telecommunications line installer and repairer positions will be needed by 2032, a 6% increase from 2022 levels. However, contractors report that recruiting skilled workers for fiber splicing, directional drilling, and network testing has proven difficult and time-consuming. The challenge isn’t just about numbers—skills mismatch and onboarding lag pose real bottlenecks for projects.
Union-backed crews, traditionally key in major infrastructure projects, deal with overlapping demand from renewable energy, electric vehicle infrastructure, and commercial construction sectors. Many ISPs cite a lack of experienced foremen and mid-level technicians as bigger impediments than entry-level labor.
Even mid-size ISPs are responding with customized approaches, including training bootcamps, partnerships with community colleges, and retention incentives for field techs. Combined, these efforts are offsetting pressure and sustaining project timelines.
Setbacks exist, but they haven’t halted the drive. The fiber build continues, adapting to the supply and labor environment with the same resilience that has characterized the broader broadband push in recent years.
Even as BEAD program funds await final disbursement, fiber expansion continues to forge ahead, powered by a wave of technological innovation. Providers are leaning into efficiency-focused deployment methods that shave weeks off traditional build timelines. Three approaches in particular—micro-trenching, aerial fiber, and GIS-driven network design—are having an outsized impact.
Micro-trenching enables contractors to cut narrow trenches—often 1 to 2 inches wide and less than a foot deep—into sidewalks or roadways to lay fiber. Compared to open trenching, which can require full road closures and extensive permitting, micro-trenching reduces surface disruption and slashes labor time. According to Vermeer Corporation, this method cuts installation time by up to 60% and reduces restoration costs significantly.
For less dense or rural markets where ground-level trenching is inefficient, aerial fiber presents a solid alternative. Stringing fiber cables along existing utility poles dramatically shortens installation timelines. In some applications—especially across rolling terrain or farmland—aerial deployment reduces cost by up to 40% per mile compared to underground burial.
Geographic Information Systems (GIS) are driving a more intelligent design phase. Fiber engineers use GIS platforms to map utility corridors, analyze terrain, and simulate deployment costs—before breaking ground. This reduces engineering change orders during construction and streamlines the permitting process.
With the timing of BEAD funding still in flux, these advancements take on critical importance. The integration of cost-effective and rapid-deployment technologies allows providers to capitalize on available capital and maintain project timelines. In practical terms, this means fiber expansion no longer waits on bureaucracy—it proceeds with precision planning and on-the-ground adaptability.
Instead of relying solely on large-scale, grant-funded projects, ISPs and infrastructure firms are structuring builds in smaller phases, using scalable and efficient technology to pivot as financial variables shift. The result: construction keeps moving, and communities see faster access to high-speed fiber even in an unpredictable funding environment.
Across the U.S., public-private partnerships (PPPs) are accelerating fiber broadband deployments, often outpacing BEAD-related projects that remain stalled in planning or environmental reviews. Cities, counties, and state governments are working directly with ISPs and infrastructure specialists to finance and build last-mile and middle-mile networks, especially in underserved and rural areas.
Ammon, Idaho, stands as a standout example. The city’s municipal open-access network, supported by public funding and private ISP operation, has offered gigabit speeds since 2011. Another model finds success in Maine, where the ConnectMaine Authority collaborated with the Island Institute and Axiom Technologies to bring fiber to 13 island and coastal communities. These efforts, grounded in collaboration, have delivered tangible outcomes long before BEAD dollars began trickling in.
Public-sector incentives and strategic co-investment are reducing deployment risks and accelerating timeframes. Local governments are offering streamlined permitting, access to utility poles, and coordinated trenching opportunities to entice private network builders. In exchange, private partners are committing capital, labor, and long-term service operations.
Take Colorado’s Advance Colorado Broadband grant initiative. Municipalities can match state funds and partner with providers who commit to network maintenance and affordable pricing guarantees. The result: lower installation costs and risk-sharing mechanisms that make fiber builds viable in low-density zones. By bridging financing gaps and boosting return-on-investment potential, these PPP models attract engaged ISPs determined to deploy high-performance networks.
While BEAD application reviews continue, several states and cities are not waiting. They're actively shaping infrastructure plans to be shovel-ready—design completed, permits secured, and construction crews lined up. States like North Carolina, Virginia, and Ohio are leading this strategy. Having clear engineering designs and community engagement toolkits in hand heightens eligibility for both BEAD and private investment.
The city of Chattanooga, Tennessee, is leveraging experience from the publicly-owned EPB Fiber Optics network to offer consulting to other municipalities preparing detailed buildout plans. These efforts ensure they’re not just eligible but competitive in the bid for BEAD funding—positioning themselves as low-risk, high-impact investment locations.
Where public resolve meets private expertise, networks get built, homes get connected, and digital deserts begin to disappear—no waiting required.
Despite the timing setbacks in the Broadband Equity, Access, and Deployment (BEAD) program, fiber expansion in the U.S. continues on an upward trajectory. Deployment efforts haven't stalled; they've simply recalibrated. Internet Service Providers have ramped up investment strategies, state governments have unlocked alternative funding streams, and rural collectives have accelerated last-mile builds, often ahead of federal disbursements. The result: thousands of miles of new fiber laid, gigabit speeds reaching further, and connectivity gaps shrinking—albeit unevenly.
Throughout 2023 and into early 2024, multiple fiber projects remained on pace or exceeded prior year benchmarks. Leichtman Research Group reports nearly 7.9 million new fiber broadband additions in 2023 alone, up from 6.3 million in 2022. This is not a market in stasis. Independent providers, municipal networks, and rural electric co-ops are leading local deployments with or without BEAD dollars in hand.
What’s driving the momentum? A combination of lower equipment costs, maturing project pipelines, and significantly streamlined permitting in several states. New partnerships between public institutions and private equity are filling in the financial gaps. The technology is proven, the demand is surging, and broadband infrastructure has finally become an economic priority, not a secondary concern.
Equitable access to high-speed internet is now baked into state development agendas, education policy, telehealth strategy, and workforce planning. Fiber is not just being deployed—it is being positioned as foundational infrastructure, akin to power grids and highways. This shift in perception fuels more action and tighter alignment between local governments, ISPs, and funding authorities.
Maintaining this pace demands more than optimism. Coordinated policymaking, sustained funding from multiple sources, and investment in workforce development will decide whether current gains become lasting infrastructure. The BEAD program may accelerate this, but it no longer defines the full scope of the fiber future.