Call: 1-877-697-2926

Comcast & Spectrum on Track to Lose Over 1 Million Internet Customers in 2025 as Cord Cutting Grows

The tide has turned once again. Comcast and Spectrum, the two largest U.S. cable internet providers, are on track to lose more than 1 million internet customers in 2025. This shift is not part of the original cord-cutting movement that reshaped the TV landscape—this is Cord Cutting 2.0.

Unlike the first wave, which saw households drop pay-TV packages in favor of streaming platforms, this new phase reflects a deeper transformation. Consumers are now walking away from bundled internet deals entirely. Many are seeking greater flexibility, more competitive pricing, and faster speeds from wireless alternatives. The increasing availability of 5G home internet and unlimited mobile data plans has introduced credible, high-performance competition that directly threatens traditional broadband.

What’s driving this massive churn? It's a mix of evolving digital habits, widespread dissatisfaction with legacy providers, and a rapid acceleration of mobile-centric connectivity preferences. As more users opt for leaner, modular, or mobile-first solutions, the traditional broadband model is cracking under the pressure. Are cable giants ready to handle the fallout?

The Evolution of Cord Cutting: Enter 2.0

Cord Cutting 1.0 vs. 2.0

The original wave of cord cutting—labeled Cord Cutting 1.0—focused heavily on ditching traditional cable TV. Households grew tired of bloated channel packages and were quick to replace them with on-demand services like Netflix, Hulu, and Prime Video. By 2020, over 6 million U.S. households had cut the cord on pay TV, according to eMarketer.

Cord Cutting 2.0 redefines the landscape entirely. This time, consumers aren’t just abandoning cable television—they’re leaving behind the legacy bundles that tie home internet to other services. Increasingly, subscribers are shedding cable-run internet in favor of alternative broadband options, particularly fiber and 5G fixed wireless.

In this second wave, the focus has shifted from shaving off a few channels to rethinking who provides connectivity and how it’s consumed. People want faster speeds, lower latency, and pricing that reflects actual usage—not static packages built for the previous decade.

Changing Consumer Behavior

Digital habits have evolved rapidly. Young professionals, remote workers, and digital nomads now prioritize:

Traditional ISPs like Comcast and Spectrum built scale on the assumption that customers would keep needing cable alongside internet access. Cord Cutting 2.0 breaks that equation. Subscribers now unbundle entirely, shedding unnecessary services, and opting into modular, streamlined solutions—whether that’s a prepaid 5G home internet plan or direct fiber from a local provider.

This shift is more than a trend; it's an infrastructure-level transformation of consumer expectations and behavior. Cord Cutting 2.0 doesn’t just cut cords—it reshapes who connects, how, and why.

The Traditional Cable Model Falters in a Fiber-First World

New Infrastructure Takes the Lead

In markets across the United States, consumers are turning away from outdated coaxial cable networks in favor of modern, high-capacity infrastructure. Fiber-optic and wireless internet providers—specifically those offering fixed wireless access (FWA) and fiber-to-the-home (FTTH)—are expanding rapidly, pulling market share directly from legacy giants like Comcast and Spectrum. According to the Leichtman Research Group, in Q4 2023, U.S. cable companies lost over 1.1 million broadband subscribers in contrast with fiber providers adding 630,000. The trend isn’t slowing in 2025.

While cable ISPs continue to rely largely on hybrid fiber-coaxial (HFC) networks, this model fails to match the symmetrical speeds and lower latency offered by end-to-end fiber or 5G-based alternatives. As fiber overlays extend into suburban and even rural communities, traditional cable no longer holds its speed advantage nor its geographic exclusivity.

Legacy Infrastructure Faces a New Generation of Competitors

Comcast and Spectrum, two of the largest U.S. internet providers, built their dominance around widespread cable TV infrastructure, layering broadband on top. But newer entrants—like AT&T Fiber, Frontier, Google Fiber, and T-Mobile 5G Home Internet—deploy light, scalable infrastructure built for the demands of modern data consumption. The playing field has shifted: being first to market with cable no longer guarantees customer retention.

These newer or revitalized players operate with fewer legacy obligations, faster deployment timelines, and significantly slimmer cost structures. The result: lower pricing, better performance, and fewer service headaches—key reasons why subscribers are migrating away from traditional cable incumbents.

Bundling No Longer Brings Value

The long-standing tactic of bundling TV services with internet is unraveling. Linear TV subscriptions are declining at a rate of over 7% annually according to eMarketer, and the value mix has shifted entirely. Where once cable companies leveraged TV packages as a retention tool, that strategy now works in reverse. TV bundling increases customers’ bills and limits flexibility, encouraging them to drop everything including internet service when better options arise.

Even advertising value tied to these bundles has waned. With restricted reach and shrinking audiences, companies relying on traditional TV advertising—like Comcast through NBCUniversal—face falling CPMs and lower campaign effectiveness. As ad dollars shift toward streaming giants and digital platforms, bundling continues to lose relevance.

What emerges is a landscape where legacy cable ISPs carry heavy infrastructure baggage, outdated value propositions, and mounting subscriber churn—all while nimbler, fiber-optimized competitors erode their base neighborhood by neighborhood.

Inside the Numbers: Comcast and Spectrum Subscriber Data at a Glance

Q1–Q3 2024 Subscriber Trends

Comcast and Charter Communications, the operator of the Spectrum brand, recorded significant declines in their fixed broadband subscriber bases over the first three quarters of 2024. These are not subtle shifts — the numbers point toward a sustained pattern in consumer behavior, underlined by growing disinterest in traditional internet-and-TV bundles.

Together, the two companies dropped more than 1.1 million internet subscribers across the first nine months of 2024 — already putting them on track to exceed projected 2025 losses unless the trend reverses. For comparison, both companies had collectively lost around 820,000 broadband subscribers in the entire 2023 calendar year.

Dissecting the Losses

Charter’s subscriber decline accelerated across the three quarters. After losing 145,000 customers in Q1 2024, Q2 saw that figure jump to 226,000, followed by 259,000 departures in Q3. Analysts from MoffettNathanson note that while Spectrum's national footprint remains strong, its relative pricing disadvantage and the rise of fixed wireless competitors such as T-Mobile Home Internet are eroding its lead.

Comcast’s Xfinity brand follows a similar trajectory. The company disclosed a Q1 net broadband loss of 297,000 — its largest quarterly loss in over a decade. While Q2 and Q3 losses were more modest, at 115,000 and 75,000 respectively, they mark the continuation of a slide that began in mid-2022.

Xfinity’s Mixed Performance in Bundled Services

Despite subscriber attrition, Xfinity remains the top U.S. broadband provider by total market share, but its advantage is deteriorating. In the video segment, Comcast shed 543,000 pay-TV subscribers in Q3 2024 alone, further distancing consumers from its dual-service bundles. The bundling offer that once gave Comcast its edge now functions as a liability, as customers pivot toward flexible, à la carte streaming alternatives.

Attempts to cross-sell broadband and video services through Xfinity Rewards and its Xumo Stream Box platform haven’t arrested the trend. ARPU (average revenue per user) remains flat quarter-over-quarter, suggesting that while Comcast retains higher-paying customers, it loses traction among price-sensitive segments — segments where streaming and fixed wireless continue to gain ground.

What does that tell you? The legacy tactics aren’t delivering growth anymore, and adhesion to bundled packages isn’t holding. With nearly 55% of Xfinity’s broadband base no longer subscribing to video, the bundling model has started to crack wide open.

What’s Driving the Exodus from Comcast and Spectrum?

Shifting Consumer Preferences

By 2025, Comcast and Spectrum project a combined loss exceeding 1 million internet subscribers. The core reason—consumers are dismantling traditional service expectations in favor of digital-first, untethered solutions.

Heightened Connectivity and User Expectations

Next-generation users have different expectations. Download speeds are no longer the only metric—upload speeds, latency, and consistency define user experience in today's landscape.

Intensifying Competition from Wireless and Fiber

The surge of fixed wireless and fiber disruptors is reshaping regional broadband dynamics.

Consumers aren’t just opting out—they’re choosing better setups, tailored experiences, and next-gen networks. This behavioral shift, paired with new infrastructure from aggressive players, leaves legacy ISPs scrambling to keep up.

The Streaming Takeover and Its Ripple Effects

From Prime-Time to Playlists: Streaming Dismantles the Cable Status Quo

Streaming platforms have redrawn the entertainment landscape, and in doing so, they’ve pulled the rug out from under legacy Internet and cable providers. Between 2018 and 2023, streaming video consumption in the U.S. quadrupled, according to Nielsen’s The Gauge report. In July 2023 alone, streaming captured 38.7% of total TV usage—outpacing both broadcast (20%) and cable (29.6%). This surge isn’t temporary. It signals a new default mode for media consumption.

The rise of dedicated streaming services—Netflix, Disney+, Hulu, and Amazon Prime Video—has eroded the perceived necessity for bundled television. Add in live service options like YouTube TV and fuboTV, and viewers now piece together their content diets à la carte. Content is no longer tied to cable packages; audiences have taken control of where, how, and when they view.

Ad-Supported Streaming Models Add Fuel

Not everyone wants to pay premium monthly fees to binge their favorite shows. That’s where ad-supported platforms like Pluto TV, Tubi, and even Hulu’s ad-tier step in. These services are reshaping monetization strategies and diverting advertising dollars away from legacy ISPs. In 2023, U.S. connected TV ad spending hit $25.09 billion and is projected to reach $40.90 billion by 2027, according to Insider Intelligence. That money used to be parked with cable operators; not anymore.

TV Is Now Optional, Not Foundational

For a growing share of households, traditional television isn’t just outdated—it’s irrelevant. The notion of the “TV package” has lost cultural weight, particularly among younger viewers. According to a report from Deloitte, 52% of Gen Z consumers prefer streaming over watching live TV. This shift has not only reduced subscription rates but also chipped away at Comcast and Spectrum’s TV-ad bundling power. Ad budgets follow eyeballs. The eyeballs have moved on.

When everyone can stream exactly what they want—whenever they want, on any device—the gravitational center of media consumption no longer sits with cable companies. Streaming hasn’t just become dominant; it has made legacy TV consumption models obsolete.

Cost Concerns: Cable Bundles vs. Streaming Alternatives

Bundled Pricing vs. Customized Flexibility

Bundled cable packages from providers like Comcast Xfinity and Spectrum have long advertised convenience. But when breaking down the actual cost, the gap between expectations and reality often widens. Xfinity’s Triple Play package—bundling internet, TV, and phone—averaged $150 to $180 per month in 2023, depending on location and promotional discounts. After those promotions expire, rates commonly climb by $30 to $50 per month, pushing totals into the $200+ bracket.

By contrast, a common streaming stack built around à la carte services paired with standalone internet remains significantly lower. Consider this breakdown:

Compared to an escalating $200 cable bundle, consumers pocket $70 or more monthly with an à la carte model, while accessing similar—if not broader—content across devices. This price delta intensifies when users don't require all services traditionally locked into cable bundles, such as landline phone service or sports channels.

The Unspoken Add-Ons: Fees, Leases, and Contracts

Beyond the advertised price tags, Comcast and Spectrum accumulate revenue through auxiliary charges. Equipment rental fees are a persistent example: Xfinity charges $14–$25/month for modem leasing, depending on the model. Over 12 months, that translates to $168–$300 for hardware that many streaming households replace with one-time purchases of third-party routers.

Service-related fees, including broadcast television fees (up to $27.10/month) and regional sports fees (as high as $19.45/month in certain markets), push total monthly bills far above the marketed "starting at" prices. These charges are non-negotiable and often buried in billing statements. Add data overage surcharges when customers exceed bandwidth caps—something streaming households regularly face—and the total cost climbs substantially.

Contractual obligations also weigh heavily. Promotional pricing from Comcast and Spectrum frequently locks in customers for 12–24 month periods. Leaving early? Expect termination fees ranging from $10 to $20 per remaining month on the agreement. In contrast, streaming platforms operate on month-to-month terms with no cancellation penalties.

Consumer Sentiment: Value Misalignment

Pricing inconsistency and perceived low value are eroding consumer trust. Transparent pricing plays a powerful role here—streaming services advertise real monthly rates upfront, and consumers appreciate knowing exactly what they’ll pay. Hidden charges, inflexible service tiers, and lack of modular customization accelerate dissatisfaction among legacy ISP customers.

As more consumers identify specific viewing preferences and shift to modular streaming solutions, traditional cable bundling strategies lose appeal. What matters isn’t the size of the bundle—it's the relevance and price-to-value clarity. And right now, streaming wins on both counts.

Mobile & Wireless Disruption: Redefining the Connectivity Landscape

Mobile-First Households Are Reshaping the Connectivity Model

A growing segment of users no longer sees home broadband as a core utility. Instead, they rely solely on mobile data plans—driven by the proliferation of unlimited 5G offerings and the increasing performance parity between mobile and fixed-line broadband. In 2023, Pew Research found that 19% of U.S. adults were smartphone-only internet users, up from 13% in 2015. This upward trajectory continues, particularly among younger demographics and renters who prioritize flexibility and affordability.

These mobile-first households sidestep traditional ISPs entirely, using their smartphones or mobile hotspots for streaming, working, and gaming. As 5G networks expand and deliver consistent low-latency, high-speed data, the question isn't whether mobile-only internet access is viable—it already is.

Enterprise Pivot to 5G and Edge Computing Impacts Residential Needs

At the enterprise level, shifts toward private 5G networks and edge computing are shrinking demand for centralized, high-capacity residential connections. Firms deploying edge infrastructure reduce the need to backhaul large amounts of data through legacy networks. Simultaneously, remote work tactics increasingly leverage mobile connectivity and VPNs—pushing employees away from traditional home internet setups.

Verizon, T-Mobile, and AT&T have each announced major B2B and enterprise expansions into private 5G. This push reshapes infrastructure investment and deprioritizes traditional fixed-line models. The result is a slow bleed from the broadband customer base Comcast and Spectrum have historically counted on.

“Go Anywhere” Connectivity Unhooks Users from Fixed Providers

Freedom of location no longer means settling for degraded internet quality. From portable 5G routers to eSIMs that auto-connect to the fastest local carrier, today's consumers expect seamless access everywhere—home, office, or on the road. Tesla owners stream content in parked cars. Digital nomads manage entire businesses on remote beaches. Airbnb guests travel with streaming sticks and mobile hotspots instead of logging into a host's Wi-Fi.

Each of these dynamics chips away at the perceived necessity of a fixed broadband line. As network capacity grows and latency drops, mobile and wireless options are no longer backup connectivity—they’re the default for a rising generation of users. Comcast and Spectrum, whose infrastructure and pricing models hinge on stationary use, face accelerating attrition in this new mobility-driven paradigm.

The Enterprise & SMB Segment: Can It Offset Losses?

Residential subscriber attrition is accelerating, and Comcast and Spectrum are looking toward their enterprise and small-to-mid-sized business (SMB) divisions to rebalance the scales. On the surface, business services offer higher margins and lower churn. But even with gains in this sector, the numbers don’t align strongly enough to counterbalance the residential decline.

Enterprise Growth Isn’t Keeping Pace

Between 2022 and 2023, Comcast Business revenue grew 6.9%, reaching $10.4 billion according to company filings. Charter’s Spectrum Enterprise posted a more modest 2.2% increase for the same period, at approximately $4.5 billion. These gains, while positive, are not sufficient to offset the bleeding from the consumer segment. In contrast, Charter lost 221,000 residential broadband customers in just the first quarter of 2024, and Comcast reported a similar loss of 487,000 residential broadband subscribers in Q1 alone.

Growth in business services continues, but its trajectory is incremental—nowhere near explosive enough to neutralize the exponential curve of residential cord cutting.

Cloud Platforms Undercut Legacy ISP Value

Traditional ISPs have historically thrived off dedicated business connections and networking solutions. But cloud migration is dismantling that model. Businesses are moving applications, data storage, and collaboration platforms to cloud-native SaaS providers—think AWS, Microsoft Azure, and Google Cloud Platform. This shift decentralizes traffic and diminishes dependency on static ISP infrastructure.

More companies now opt for SD-WAN and hybrid networking models. These solutions increase flexibility and often rely on multiple ISPs or bypass them entirely through direct cloud access. What does that mean for Comcast and Spectrum? Being a primary connectivity provider no longer guarantees long-term enterprise loyalty—or revenue.

SMBs Are Cost-Sensitive, and Competition Is Rising

The SMB segment is more fragmented and price-aware. New entrants, including regional fiber providers and wireless broadband innovators, target this space aggressively. Fixed wireless access (FWA) has grown rapidly—T-Mobile and Verizon added over 5 million FWA subscribers by the end of 2023, many from SMBs seeking flexibility and lower costs.

While Comcast and Spectrum do offer tiered business packages and bundled solutions, SMBs increasingly seek providers that offer a combination of performance, scalability, and cost-efficiency. They’re less tied to brand recognition and more responsive to practical value—an angle that doesn’t favor legacy ISPs with larger overhead.

Bottom Line in Numbers

The math is clear. Even aggressive enterprise and SMB segment performance won't plug the revenue hole left by over one million residential disconnects. Comcast and Spectrum are gaining in some areas, but losing more where scale was once their strength.

Technological Shifts Redefining the Playing Field

Legacy cable internet providers now operate in a drastically altered landscape. Customers no longer rely on coaxial infrastructure as their only path to high-speed internet. Instead, technological advancements in fiber optics, fixed wireless access, and mobile networks have introduced fierce competition. This disruption directly threatens customer retention rates for Comcast and Spectrum, both of which continue to depend heavily on hybrid fiber-coaxial networks in many of their service areas.

Fiber and Wireless Mesh Networks Accelerate the Shift

Fiber-to-the-home implementation by competitors like AT&T Fiber and Verizon Fios is expanding rapidly. According to the Fiber Broadband Association, U.S. fiber broadband availability reached 63 million homes by the end of 2023, a sharp rise from 45 million homes just two years earlier. With symmetrical gigabit speeds and lower latency, fiber networks are becoming the default option for households prioritizing streaming, gaming, and heavy data usage.

Wireless mesh networks — deployed by providers like T-Mobile and Starry — further disrupt fixed-line dominance. These networks bypass traditional last-mile cabling, leveraging rooftop nodes and 5G infrastructure to deliver home connectivity. When customers can set up a reliable connection in minutes without technician visits or rental modems, the appeal of old-school ISPs erodes rapidly.

AI-Powered Streaming Interfaces Eclipse Static Guides

While Comcast and Spectrum continue to promote traditional electronic program guides (EPGs) through services like Xfinity X1 and Spectrum TV, users increasingly bypass these platforms. Streaming applications now embed AI algorithms that deliver hyper-personalized content recommendations. Netflix, for example, uses a real-time machine learning engine trained on hundreds of user signals to serve individual tiles on its interface, a process far more dynamic than browsing a channel grid.

This capability deepens engagement. According to Loop Capital Markets, apps with advanced recommendation engines see up to 60% more watch time per session than traditional TV platforms. The longer users stay within a single app ecosystem, the less motivation they have to maintain ISP-sponsored TV bundles or browse provider-hosted video content.

Seamless Mobile Integration Leaves ISP Portals Behind

ISP web portals were once central to the digital experience, but high-performing mobile apps now outmaneuver them. Consider the contrast: opening a generic cable provider login page vs. instantly accessing HBO Max, Hulu, or YouTube TV through biometric authentication on a smartphone. The difference in speed, fluidity, and personalization is undeniable.

Comcast and Spectrum have yet to match the quality and immediacy of these direct-to-consumer experiences. Instead of enhancing customer loyalty through their platforms, they’re losing engagement to tech-first streaming competitors who treat mobile as the primary screen, not an afterthought.

The technological balance has tipped. Fiber and wireless networks hollow out coax-based infrastructure. AI-driven content discovery outpaces static TV guides. And mobile-first platforms rewrite how consumers interact with content. In this new environment, yesterday’s advantages are liabilities. The challenge now is how fast incumbents move — or if they move at all.

The Tipping Point: Why Cord Cutting 2.0 Leaves No Room for Complacency

Comcast and Spectrum no longer face the threat of disruption—it’s already happening. The shift from traditional cable and broadband to mobile-first and cloud-delivered services demands urgent action. Consumers are moving fast, and the market shows no patience for laggards.

Both companies risk hemorrhaging over a million internet subscribers in 2025. That figure reflects sustained churn rates, heightened competition from fixed-wireless access (FWA) and fiber providers, and a seismic shift in what households perceive as valuable connectivity. Customers aren’t just leaving cable TV. They’re rethinking their entire home internet stack—prioritizing flexibility, performance, and pricing transparency over legacy bundles and promotional gimmicks.

To adapt, Comcast and Spectrum must rethink their market posture in three fundamental areas:

The timeline to act is tight. Over the next 12 to 24 months, digital-native challengers like T-Mobile and Verizon—with their aggressive fixed-wireless rollouts—will continue clawing market share. Tech-savvy users are already signing off cable and adopting gigabit-ready alternatives from regional fiber players. Once loyalty fades, customer recovery becomes prohibitively expensive.