Call: 1-877-697-2926

50 U.S. States Broadband Speed Performance 2025

Broadband serves as the backbone of modern digital life, enabling fast downloads, live streaming, cloud computing, and remote work. As connectivity drives everything from education to commerce, broadband speed isn't just a convenience-it defines access to opportunity. Across the United States, performance varies significantly depending on region, population density, and infrastructure investment. To capture this landscape, nationwide reports measure average broadband speeds and compare them across the 50 states. This data gives a clear view into how quickly users can download content and engage with bandwidth-intensive applications. Where does your state stand?

How Broadband Speeds Are Measured Across the 50 U.S. States

Data Sources: Grounded in Reliability

Two primary sources inform the assessment of broadband speed performance across the 50 U.S. states: Ookla's Speedtest Intelligence data and Federal Communications Commission (FCC) broadband deployment reports. Ookla captures millions of real-world internet speed tests each day, while the FCC aggregates broadband access and infrastructure data from internet service providers across the country.

Ookla's dataset includes test results from users who initiate speed tests from their devices, providing a bottom-up view of actual internet performance. The FCC's data complements this by offering insight into advertised speeds, coverage maps, and service provider reports.

Speed Test Procedures and Reliability

Speed tests reflect real-time, user-initiated measurements of download speed, upload speed, and latency. These tests involve sending and receiving packets of data between a user's device and a nearby server, calculating data transfer rates and measuring the time delay in milliseconds. For consistency, this broadband speed assessment focuses on fixed broadband services, excluding mobile internet speeds.

Accuracy comes from volume. With over 10 million monthly tests in the U.S. alone, Ookla applies statistical filters to remove anomalies such as extremely low sample counts, VPN usage, or tests conducted during network throttling. The result: robust, granular, and consistently reliable speed data reflecting consumer experience.

Scope of Analysis and Timeframe

This broadband speed report draws on test data collected between January 1 and December 31, 2023. All 50 states have been included, with data segmented by state boundaries as defined by internet service provider reporting regions. Urban and rural partitions are also recognized to allow deeper analysis of regional disparities, though those details are explored in a later section.

The assessment ranks states based on median download speed as a primary indicator, supplemented by median upload speeds and latency metrics for context. Only fixed broadband connections such as cable, fiber, and DSL were included to provide an apples-to-apples comparison across residential and business internet users.

Why Median, Not Average?

Median values eliminate distortion from outliers. States with small populations connected to ultra-high-speed networks in concentrated areas might show inflated average speeds. By using median performance instead, this assessment captures the internet speeds that most users in each state actually experience.

Mapping the Reach: Broadband Accessibility Across the United States

National Trends in Broadband Availability

The Federal Communications Commission defines broadband as internet service with minimum download speeds of 25 Mbps and upload speeds of 3 Mbps. As of 2023, the FCC reports that more than 94% of U.S. residents have access to broadband service meeting this standard. However, this figure represents geographic coverage, not actual user experience or subscription rates.

Coverage varies dramatically depending on population density and infrastructure investment. While metropolitan regions showcase near-universal access and competitive speeds often exceeding 100 Mbps, large portions of rural America remain underserved. High-speed fiber connections dominate in densely populated states, but sparsely populated areas often rely on aging DSL or satellite connections, which deliver lower speeds and higher latency.

Urban Versus Rural Availability

Dig deeper into the numbers, and the urban-rural divide becomes immediately evident. According to the National Telecommunications and Information Administration (NTIA), as of late 2022:

The gap widens further when raising the threshold. For speeds of at least 100 Mbps down and 25 Mbps up:

This discrepancy stems largely from infrastructure economics. Building last-mile connections-particularly fiber-to spread-out communities drives up costs significantly per user. In many rural counties, population density falls below the threshold needed to attract private investment without government subsidies.

Geographic Pockets of Disconnection

Entire regions-particularly in Appalachia, the Great Plains, and parts of the Mountain West-remain chronically underserved. For example, states like West Virginia and Mississippi show lower-than-average broadband access rates, especially when examining fixed broadband with download speeds exceeding 50 Mbps. Residents in these areas often rely on mobile data or satellite services, which offer limited capacity and inconsistent reliability for applications like video conferencing or online learning.

What Affects Accessibility the Most?

Several variables shape broadband accessibility nationwide:

Broadband availability doesn't just hinge on laying fiber. Decisions made by policymakers, subsidies offered to telecom operators, and community-led initiatives all influence whether a household can get high-speed internet-or not.

Comparing All 50 U.S. States by Broadband Speed

The speed of broadband connectivity reveals more than just how fast residents can stream or download-it's a measure of infrastructure, policy prioritization, and market competition. Here's a ranked list of average broadband speeds for all 50 U.S. states, based on recent analysis of over 50 million speed test records from Ookla, Fast.com, and M-Lab in 2023.

Broadband Speed Rankings by State (2023 Average Download Speeds in Mbps)

States Leading the Broadband Race

Maryland, Virginia, and Delaware claim the top three spots with average speeds exceeding 488 Mbps. These states benefit from dense population centers, aggressive fiber-optic deployment, and strong public-private broadband initiatives. The presence of major internet exchange points in Baltimore and Washington D.C. contributes to this performance, as do statewide digital equity investments.

Connecticut stands out at position nine with a remarkable average speed of 444.2 Mbps. This performance reflects its high rate of fiber-optic penetration, particularly in cities like Stamford and Hartford, combined with a competitive ISP landscape that includes providers like Xfinity, Frontier, and Optimum. The result: consistent gigabit availability for residential and business users alike.

States Facing Connectivity Hurdles

Hawaii, Wyoming, and Alaska rank at the bottom, each with average speeds below 160 Mbps. Sparse populations, geographic isolation, and limited fiber infrastructure continue to impede broadband development in these areas. While efforts are underway to expand coverage, the speed gap remains significant compared to the national median.

Dissecting the Numbers: Analysis of Broadband Speed Test Data Across the 50 U.S. States

What the Data Reveals

Broadband speed test data from millions of devices across the United States reveals a wide disparity in average download and upload speeds between states. When comparing these figures, several dominant trends appear. States with dense populations and greater infrastructure investment consistently perform above national averages.

Identifying Trends and Outliers

Urbanized coastal states dominate high-speed performance rankings. Investment by ISPs combined with strong policy environments correlate with better outcomes. For instance, Massachusetts not only benefits from its urban clusters, but also from competitive ISP markets that drive infrastructure upgrades.

Several outliers disrupt regional expectations. Despite its topographic challenges, Utah consistently ranks within the top ten, averaging over 175 Mbps download speed. This is due to aggressive fiber rollouts over the past decade and municipal broadband initiatives. On the flip side, Louisiana, despite being surrounded by stronger performing neighbors, remains below the national average, largely due to underinvestment and a fragmented provider landscape.

The Reliability and Constraints of Speed Test Data

Speed tests offer a valuable real-world snapshot of network performance, but they're not infallible. Several external variables influence test outcomes:

Unlike maximum advertised speeds, speed test data reflects actual user experience-this adds to its authenticity but also introduces variability. While platforms like Ookla and M-Lab aggregate millions of data points and apply statistical smoothing, rural test counts remain significantly lower. This skews results in less populated states where fewer data samples can distort the representation of network performance.

Despite these limitations, longitudinal comparisons remain valid. States that show consistent year-over-year gains signal effective infrastructure policies and ISP investment. Conversely, stagnation in median speeds over multiple quarters highlights systemic issues in broadband rollout and modernization.

Rural vs. Urban Broadband Speed Disparities

Broadband speed performance varies sharply between rural and urban areas across the 50 U.S. states. While metropolitan regions enjoy faster and more consistent access, rural communities often lag several steps behind, constrained by outdated infrastructure and limited provider competition.

Urban Areas: Dense Networks, Competitive Performance

In urban centers, the broadband infrastructure benefits from economies of scale. A higher population density allows internet service providers (ISPs) to justify investments in fiber-optic networks and advanced technologies. According to data from the Federal Communications Commission (FCC), fiber coverage reaches over 75% of urban households, supporting median download speeds of 150 Mbps or higher in many metro hubs, such as New York City, San Francisco, and Chicago.

These conditions produce broadband environments that meet or exceed the national median speed benchmark of approximately 142 Mbps, based on Ookla's Q1 2024 Speedtest Intelligence data.

Rural Areas: Infrastructure Gaps and Slower Speeds

Outside city limits, broadband speeds drop significantly. In many cases, rural users depend on fixed wireless, DSL, or satellite connections. These technologies inherently provide lower bandwidth, and performance often diminishes during peak usage hours due to higher contention ratios and signal degradation.

USDA's 2023 Rural Development report highlights that less than 60% of rural residents have access to 100 Mbps or faster connections, compared with 95% in urban areas. Consider the states of Alaska and Mississippi-both exhibit some of the slowest rural broadband speeds in the nation, with averages under 50 Mbps in sparsely populated counties.

The Impact of Speed Disparities

The urban-rural speed divide affects more than just streaming quality. It directly impacts the ability to work remotely, participate in virtual classrooms, or access digital healthcare services. These limitations create a secondary layer of inequality, especially in states with vast rural geographies like Montana, West Virginia, and Wyoming.

Although low-Earth orbit satellite services and state-funded rural fiber projects show promise, current deployment rates haven't yet closed the gap. As of early 2024, the speed differential between urban and rural users in the same state can reach up to 120 Mbps, as seen in Virginia and Pennsylvania-underscoring geographic broadband inequity at the granular level.

The disparity in speed isn't a reflection of demand-rural residents consume and require digital bandwidth as much as their urban counterparts. Rather, it represents a mismatch between infrastructure availability and community needs. Closing this performance gap will depend on synchronized public investment, policy reform, and innovative delivery models tailored to remote regions.

How Internet Service Providers Shape Broadband Speed Performance Across States

Measuring ISP Influence on State-Level Broadband Speeds

The disparity in broadband speed among the 50 U.S. states ties directly to the operational strategies, coverage maps, infrastructure investment, and pricing models of Internet Service Providers (ISPs). ISPs vary in their performance capabilities, especially when comparing large-scale national providers like Comcast Xfinity or AT&T to smaller, regional players such as Sonic in California or Midco in the Midwest. These differences influence average download and upload speeds significantly at the state level.

States with broad access to Tier 1 ISPs tend to report higher average speeds. For instance, states like New Jersey and Maryland benefit from widespread fiber-optic rollouts by Verizon Fios, consistently ranking among the top five states in terms of broadband performance. This correlation between robust infrastructure deployment and higher state averages holds across both urban and suburban environments.

Competition Drives Speed-and Coverage

In areas where multiple ISPs compete within the same geographic markets, consumer choice pushes providers to offer faster and more reliable internet. This competitive dynamic has measurably improved performance in densely populated areas. Washington State, for example, enjoys a high average speed partly due to the overlapping presence of Comcast, CenturyLink, and Ziply Fiber.

Where competition is limited or absent, speed stagnation becomes the norm. Monopoly providers in rural states such as Mississippi and West Virginia tend to offer DSL or low-speed cable as their primary service, which hampers the state's aggregate broadband performance.

Even when infrastructure exists, pricing strategies can limit access. In some suburban areas, fiber connections remain underutilized because ISPs price gigabit-tier plans beyond the average household budget. This leads to speed underperformance despite high-capacity backbone availability.

Ultimately, the ISP landscape-defined by market share, investment intensity, and pricing transparency-serves as a core driver of each state's broadband speed performance. Comparing this landscape across the U.S. highlights how provider behavior either accelerates or constrains digital infrastructure growth at the state level.

The Digital Divide and Its Effects on Education and Employment

Broadband speed is more than a technical metric-it draws a line between opportunity and limitation. The disparity in internet speeds across the 50 U.S. states has created gaps in access that directly impact two of society's most critical pillars: education and employment.

When Slow Speeds Limit Education

Students in states with lower average broadband speeds face consistent barriers to digital learning. According to the 2023 "Household Pulse Survey" by the U.S. Census Bureau, 16.4% of households with children in rural areas reported their internet access as "not adequate" for online learning. This figure drops significantly in suburban and urban regions with more robust broadband infrastructure.

Real-time activities such as video conferencing, interactive simulations, and cloud-based assignments require speeds above 25 Mbps-yet states like West Virginia, Mississippi, and Arkansas report average download speeds well under that benchmark, based on Ookla's Q1 2024 broadband data. In these environments, students struggle with dropped connections, frequent buffering, and slow uploads, all of which curtail academic performance and engagement.

Broadband as a Gateway to Employment

Remote job opportunities, digital upskilling programs, and gig economy platforms increasingly rely on stable, high-speed connections. Job seekers in states with lagging broadband infrastructure face a compounded disadvantage. Not only do they experience reduced access to postings and educational tools, but many also fail to meet the technical requirements for remote roles.

A report from the Federal Reserve Bank of Philadelphia (2022) found that counties in the lowest broadband quartile had 26% fewer remote job postings per capita compared to those in the highest quartile. This gap translates directly into diminished economic mobility, reinforcing cycles of underemployment in regions already facing structural challenges.

The Reinforcement of Existing Inequalities

The result is a digital divide that doesn't just reflect geography-it deepens pre-existing socio-economic disparities. Broadband speed performance across the 50 U.S. states acts as both a mirror and a magnifier of the inequality embedded in the country's education and labor systems.

Federal and State Broadband Expansion Programs

Large-Scale Investments Target Coverage and Performance

Congressional funding and executive agency coordination have scaled up significantly since 2021 to bridge broadband gaps across all 50 states. The Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act (IIJA), enacted in late 2021, allocated $65 billion to improve broadband infrastructure nationwide. Within this legislation, the flagship Broadband Equity, Access, and Deployment (BEAD) Program drew $42.45 billion-the largest federal broadband investment to date. Administered by the National Telecommunications and Information Administration (NTIA), BEAD aims not only to expand reach but also to elevate baseline performance.

Each state receives funding based on its unserved and underserved households. States must submit action plans outlining how projects will meet the minimum speed requirement of 100 Mbps download / 20 Mbps upload for new infrastructure builds. These standards pave the way for networks capable of scaling to gigabit speeds under future demand conditions.

FCC Oversight Sets National Standards and Funding Allocation

The Federal Communications Commission (FCC) enforces the baseline criteria used to assess service quality and determine areas eligible for improvement funding. Through tools like the National Broadband Map, the FCC tracks coverage at the address level, pressuring providers to submit accurate service data. This data drives the targeting process for federal programs like the Rural Digital Opportunity Fund (RDOF) and its predecessor, the Connect America Fund.

Alongside funding, the FCC also regulates spectrum allocation, net neutrality policy, and enforcement actions against deceptive provider practices-factors that cumulatively shape the broadband speed performance experienced by consumers at state and neighborhood levels.

States Launch Individual Plans to Complement Federal Models

Dozens of states have constructed their own broadband offices or task forces since 2020. These agencies act as lead implementers of federal funding while customizing initiatives to match local geographic, economic, or demographic nuances.

States differ in governance models. Some centralize planning through a broadband czar or agency, while others delegate administration across departments such as economic development and education. These approaches directly influence how efficiently broadband improvements roll out at the local level.

Public-Private Partnerships Accelerate Deployment Timelines

While federal and state entities provide capital and regulation, private ISPs remain the primary builders and operators. State programs increasingly emphasize public-private partnerships (PPPs) to accelerate project execution. For instance, North Carolina's Growing Rural Economies with Access to Technology (GREAT) Grant program facilitates cost-sharing with vetted providers-disbursing over $380 million since its launch in 2018.

Need proof of concept? Consider how Tennessee leveraged state-facilitated joint ventures to deliver multi-gigabit services to Appalachian communities by pairing local electric cooperatives with national fiber builders. These efforts demonstrate clear performance gains in broadband speed availability across previously unserved areas.

Charting the Course for Faster, Fairer Broadband Across the U.S.

The breakdown of broadband speed performance across the 50 U.S. states uncovers measurable disparities, persistent digital divides, and areas of advancement. From densely connected urban centers to underserved rural counties, the data consistently ties broadband performance to both socioeconomic outcomes and infrastructure investments.

Leading states, such as Maryland and Virginia, demonstrate how coordinated public-private strategies can boost network capacity and average speeds beyond 150 Mbps, according to Ookla's 2023 Speedtest Intelligence data. Meanwhile, states with slower average speeds often correlate with low fiber-optic coverage and lower broadband adoption rates, particularly in rural areas.

To enhance national broadband performance and close these gaps, targeted initiatives must prioritize:

Progressive federal support, coordinated state policy, and aggressive infrastructure rollouts will produce measurable gains in broadband speeds and equity. Every policy choice, funding decision, and ISP partnership made now will shape internet access and competitiveness across the U.S. for decades to come.